UNITED STATES v. ASTER

No. 12970.

275 F.2d 281 (1960)

UNITED STATES of America and Jack Aloff, Appellant, v. Jay ASTER, Individually and Trading as Wingate Construction Co., National Surety Corporation and The Crouse-Hinds Co.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided February 17, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Claude O. Lanciano, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

Joseph H. Lieberman, Pa., F. Hastings Griffin, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa. (John V. Lovitt, Beechwood & Lovitt, Barnes, Dechert, Price, Myers & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.

Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and GOODRICH and McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judges.


McLAUGHLIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a dismissal of a qui tam or informer's action brought under 31 U.S.C.A. §§ 231, 232, 233 and 235.

The district court found that the essential information upon which the suit was predicated was in the possession of the United States prior to the filing of the suit. Such information was given to the government by the informer who now brings this claim. The court construed Section 232(C) as depriving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases