1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 225 Or.
  5. 225 Or. 331 (1960)
 

PRINCE v. PRINCE

225 Or. 331 (1960)

358 P.2d 506

PRINCE v. PRINCE

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed December 29, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Nichols argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were Fitzgibbon & Nichols, Portland.

Robert G. Ringo argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Ringo and Walton, Corvallis.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and HOWELL, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

O'CONNELL, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a decree granting her a divorce and making an allocation of various items of property. Plaintiff seeks a readjustment of the property allocation on the ground that the trial court erred in failing to give full weight to undisputed testimony concerning the plaintiff's contribution in the acquisition of certain items of property.

1, 2. There is a direct conflict...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases