1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 221 Md.
  5. 221 Md. 322 (1960)
 

LUSTINE v. STATE ROADS COMM.

[No. 124, September Term, 1959.]

221 Md. 322 (1960)

157 A.2d 456

LUSTINE ET AL. v. STATE ROADS COMMISSION

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 20, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel J. DeBlasis, with whom was Harry A. Boswell on the brief, for appellants.

T. Thornton Murray, Special Attorney, with whom were C. Ferdinand Sybert, Attorney General of Maryland, and Joseph D. Buscher, Special Assistant Attorney General, on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

PRESCOTT, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is the second appeal by the property owners in a condemnation case wherein the State Roads Commission (Commission) is taking property for a controlled access arterial highway in Prince George's County. The facts are accurately and adequately stated in the first appeal, Lustine v. State Roads Comm., 217 Md. 274, 142 A.2d 566; so, we shall...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases