1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 179 Cal.App.2d
  5. 179 Cal.App.2d 364 (1960)
 

S & Q CONSTR. CO. v. PALMA CEIA DEV. ORGANIZATION

Docket No. 18314.

179 Cal.App.2d 364 (1960)

3 Cal. Rptr. 690

S & Q CONSTRUCTION COMPANY (a Corporation), Appellant, v. PALMA CEIA DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (a Corporation) et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

April 1, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas H. Matimore and Myrick & Deering & Scott for Appellant.

MacDonald, Brunsell, Brethauer & Walters, Harry D. Miller and John B. Brethauer for Respondents.

BRAY, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants denying damages for an alleged breach of contract.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Does the fact that Palma Ceia was an unlicensed contractor compel judgment in plaintiff's favor?

2. Does the evidence support the court's findings (a) that defendants did not breach the contract, (b) that plaintiff did?

3. Were the findings unsupported, contradictory, and did they fail to cover...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases