FREIGHT LINES v. BOWERS

Nos. 36078, 36079 and 36080.

170 Ohio St. 367 (1960)

HENNIS FREIGHT LINES, INC., APPELLEE, v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT. CRAWFORD TRANSPORT CO., INC., APPELLEE, v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT. WEST PENN FORWARDING CO., APPELLEE, v. BOWERS, TAX COMMR., APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 9, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edmund M. Brady, Mr. John M. Veale and Mr. Taylor C. Burneson, for appellees.

Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, Mr. Alvin C. Vinopal and Mr. William P. Meehan, for appellant.


Per Curiam.

Appellant contends that the mandate of the Supreme Court, above quoted, does not bar him from confirming his original assessment orders against the appellees "where the opinion of the court does not discuss or decide"the applicability of the reciprocity agreements to the Highway Use Tax Act; that the doctrine of res judicata is not applicable; and that the decisions of the Board of Tax Appeals should be reversed and remanded with instructions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases