Per Curiam.
In this court the defendants present five assignments of alleged prejudicial error on the part of the trial court, only two of which warrant discussion by this court.
The first is a claim of misconduct by the trial judge in the form of certain incidental statements made in the presence and hearing of the jury.
Taken out of their context, some of the trial judge's observations seem unnecessary and of questionable propriety. However...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
