MUZAK CORP. v. TRATTNER


28 Misc.2d 504 (1960)

Muzak Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, v. George G. Trattner, Appellant-Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

December 1, 1960


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sidney Schutz and Edward J. McCullen for appellant. Jacob F. Gottesman for respondent.

Concur — HECHT, J. P., STEUER and TILZER, JJ.


Per Curiam.

The contract provided for liquidated damages in the event defendant cancelled the agreement at the end of any yearly period. The provision for liquidated damages did not constitute a penalty. Its effect is to compensate plaintiff for permitting defendant to terminate his contractual obligations (McCready v. Lindenborn, 172 N.Y. 400; Norris v. McMechen, 135 Misc. 361; Silver Dresses, v. Parker, 73 N.Y.S.2d 704).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases