Supreme Court of Ohio.
Per Curiam.
Appellant had an adequate remedy by way of appeal from the judgment of conviction to review the alleged errors of which he complains, and the Court of Appeals properly denied him such a review by way of a proceeding in habeas corpus.
Judgment affirmed.
WEYGANDT, C. J., ZIMMERMAN, TAFT, MATTHIAS, BELL, HERBERT and PECK...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
