IN RE HACKENSACK WATER CO.


61 N.J. Super. 457 (1960)

161 A.2d 293

IN THE MATTER OF THE SCHEDULE FILED BY HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, INCREASING AND CHANGING RATES FOR WATER SERVICE. HACKENSACK WATER COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSIONERS, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 24, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Samuel W. Zerman argued the cause for appellant.

Mr. Christian Bollermann argued the cause for Mr. Alfred W. Kiefer, Rate Counsel by appointment of the Attorney General, attorney for and of counsel with appellant (Mr. Christian Bollermann, on the brief).

Mr. Richard F. Green argued the cause for respondent, Department of Public Utilities (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General, attorney for respondent; Mr. Richard F. Green, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel).

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and HANEMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by HANEMAN, J.A.D.

Hackensack Water Company (Hackensack) appeals from a decision of the Board of Public Utility Commissioners (the Board) allowing a credit to it for the payment of 55.6% of the total operating charges of DeForest Lake Reservoir (DeForest) to Spring Valley Water Works and Supply Company (Spring Valley) in connection with Hackensack's application for the establishment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases