1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 178 Cal.App.2d
  5. 178 Cal.App.2d 339 (1960)
 

RUDOLPH v. FULTON

Docket No. 18673.

178 Cal.App.2d 339 (1960)

2 Cal. Rptr. 807

PAUL C. RUDOLPH, Appellant, v. WALLACE H. FULTON et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

February 25, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul C. Rudolph, in pro. per., for Appellant.

Orrick, Dahlquist, Herrington & Sutcliffe for Respondents.

BRAY, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment entered after order sustaining demurrer without leave to amend.*

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Does a state court have jurisdiction (a) in view of the exclusive remedies provided by the Securities Exchange Act; (b) because plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies?

2. Was the trial judge prejudiced?

PLEADINGS

Defendants are the National Association...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases