1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 102 Ga.
  5. 102 Ga. App. 414 (1960)
 

SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO. v. DANIELL

38449.

102 Ga. App. 414 (1960)

116 S.E.2d 529

SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. DANIELL.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided September 22, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Claude Driver, Matthews, Maddox, Walton & Smith, John W. Maddox, for plaintiff in error.

E. B. Jones, Jr., Thomas B. Murphy, Murphy & Murphy, contra.

TOWNSEND, Judge.

1. It is the contention of the defendant that it is entitled to judgment notwithstanding the verdict because the evidence demands a finding that the plaintiff's injuries proximately resulted from his own lack of ordinary care for his safety. The evidence shows that the train crew had been engaged in switching operations and that the engine, which had been disconnected from the cars, had been motionless...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases