1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 10 Wis.2d
  5. 10 Wis.2d 41 (1960)
 

RUD v. MCNAMARA

10 Wis.2d 41 (1960)

RUD, Respondent, v. McNAMARA, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 5, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Frank E. Huettner of Cadott.

For the respondent there was a brief by Whelan & Morey of Mondovi, and oral argument by Randall E. Morey.

HALLOWS, J.

The issue raised on this appeal is whether there is sufficient credible evidence to sustain the finding of the jury. To decide such an issue we must view the evidence in a light most favorable to sustain the verdict. Ruid v. Davis (1959), 8 Wis.2d 288, 99 N.W.2d 129; Mossak v. Pfost (1950), 258 Wis. 73, 44 N.W.2d 922; Madison Trust Co. v. Helleckson (1934), 216...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases