1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 280 F.2d
  5. 280 F.2d 224 (1960)
 

VOGUE LINGERIE, INC. v. N. L. R. B.

No. 13065.

280 F.2d 224 (1960)

VOGUE LINGERIE, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Decided July 5, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gerard D. Reilly, Washington, D. C. (Lawrence T. Zimmerman, Washington, D. C., Reilly & Wells, Washington, D. C., McNerney, Page & Vanderlin, Williamsport, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner.

Melvin Welles, Washington, D. C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Marion L. Griffin, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for respondent.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

The issues presented in this petition of Vogue Lingerie, Inc., a manufacturer of ladies' wear, for review and modification of an order of the National Labor Relations Board, and a cross-petition of the Board for enforcement of that order, are largely factual. Contention centers around alleged discharges of certain Vogue employees.

One substantial controversy concerns the Board's finding that petitioner discharged employee Sylvia Robison...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases