1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ga.
  4. 102 Ga.
  5. 102 Ga. App. 394 (1960)
 

HARVEY v. DEWEILL

38385.

102 Ga. App. 394 (1960)

116 S.E.2d 747

HARVEY et al. v. DEWEILL.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided September 20, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gowen, Conyers, Fending & Dickey, for plaintiff in error.

Adams & Mattox, John D. Mattox, contra.

BELL, Judge.

1. The bill of exceptions assigns as one error the trial court's overruling of the motion for judgment non obstante veredicto. "As we understand the opinion in the case of Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co. v. Brackin, 215 Ga. 225 (109 S.E.2d 782), the Supreme Court held in substance that the purpose of the provision for judgments notwithstanding verdicts is to bring an end to litigation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases