1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 32 N.J.
  5. 32 N.J. 461 (1960)
 

LOOMAN REALTY CORP. v. BROAD STREET NAT. BANK OF TRENTON

32 N.J. 461 (1960)

161 A.2d 247

LOOMAN REALTY CORP., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE BROAD STREET NATIONAL BANK OF TRENTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. LOUIS GRAFF AND EMANUEL LERMAN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE BROAD STREET NATIONAL BANK OF TRENTON, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 23, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard J. Hughes and Mr. Nathan N. Schildkraut argued the cause for the plaintiffs-appellants (Messrs. Kahn, Schildkraut & Levy, attorneys).

Mr. John J. Connell argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Messrs. Wicoff and Lanning, attorneys).

The opinion of the court was delivered by BURLING, J.

The Looman Realty Corp. (hereinafter referred to as Looman) filed suit in the Superior Court, Chancery Division, to compel the Broad Street National Bank of Trenton, a national banking corporation, to specifically perform an alleged contract of sale of premises, owned by the Bank, located on the southwesterly corner of East State and Montgomery Streets and commonly known...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases