Per Curiam.
Appellant contends that the subject property is composed entirely of a land fill which can, under the evidence, be at most an improvement made in the exercise of a littoral right; and that littoral rights of upland owners and improvements made in the exercise thereof are not separately taxable as real property, the valuation thereon being included in the valuation of the upland, and must necessarily have a real property tax valuation of zero.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
