McNAMARA v. SADDLE RIVER BOROUGH


64 N.J. Super. 426 (1960)

166 A.2d 391

GERALD C. McNAMARA, SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 9, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Bruce H. Losche argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Losche and Losche, attorneys).

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents (Mr. James A. Major, II, attorney for plaintiffs-respondents Saddle River Country Day School and Chestnut Ridge Land Co., Inc.; Mr. Frederick J. Gassert and Messrs. Gassert, Murphy and Gassert, attorneys for plaintiffs-respondent Gerald C. McNamara).

Mr. Warren Dixon, Jr. argued the cause for William C. Wollen, amicus curiae.

Before Judges CONFORD, FREUND and KILKENNY.


PER CURIAM.

The background and nature of this action are comprehensively set out in the opinion rendered by Judge Brown in the Law Division. We incorporate it herein by reference. We are in agreement with all of the factual findings and conclusions contained therein and with most of the reasoning by which the court concludes that Ordinance No. 105 is invalid because of the disqualifying interest of Councilman Wollen in its subject matter. It is desirable, however...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases