RATSCH v. HOLDERMAN


31 N.J. 458 (1960)

158 A.2d 24

MICHAEL RATSCH, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. CARL HOLDERMAN, COMMISSIONER OF LABOR AND TRUSTEE OF THE ONE PER CENT FUND, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 8, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Stephen V.R. Strong argued the cause for the petitioner-appellant (Messrs. Strong & Strong, attorneys; Mr. Carl A. Frahn on the brief).

Mr. David M. Satz, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Mr. Grover C. Richman, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Miss Grace J. Ford, Assistant Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).


The opinion was delivered PER CURIAM.

Petitioner sought to recover compensation from the "One Per Cent Fund" (R.S. 34:15-94 et seq.) upon the thesis that a compensable injury suffered in his last employment, superimposed upon prior disability, resulted in total incapacity. The Deputy Director found petitioner had not proved his claim and the Commissioner of Labor and Industry dismissed the petition. The County Court affirmed. On our motion we certified...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases