N.J. MTGE. AND INVEST. CO. v. DORSEY


33 N.J. 448 (1960)

165 A.2d 297

NEW JERSEY MORTGAGE AND INVESTMENT CO., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOHN W. DORSEY AND CHERRY A. DORSEY, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 21, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William Furst argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Mr. Leonard Rosenstein, on the brief).

Mr. Michael H. Hochman argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Mr. Abraham Miller, attorney).


PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the Appellate Division opinion, 60 N.J.Super. 299 (1960). The nature of the case is such, however, that some additional observations are desirable.

Plaintiff relied in large measure on Colonial Discount Co. v. Bures, 8 N.J. Misc. 124 (Sup. Ct. 1930), affirmed o.b. 107 N.J.L. 374 (E. & A. 1931), to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases