1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 55 Wn.2d
  5. 55 Wn.2d 425 (1960)
 

BECKER v. LAGERQUIST BROS., INC.

No. 34535.

55 Wn.2d 425 (1960)

348 P.2d 423

RODNEY A. BECKER et al., Respondents, v. LAGERQUIST BROTHERS, INC., Appellant.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

January 14, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McCann, Barnett & Towne (Vernon W. Towne, of counsel), for appellant.

MacDonald, Hoague & Bayless, for respondents.

FOSTER, J.

Appellant corporation, defendant below, appeals from a judgment requiring specific performance of an oral agreement to pave a street or, in the alternative, to pay the cost thereof.

The gravamen of appellant's contention is that, under the parol evidence rule, the earnest-money receipt precluded extrinsic proof of an oral agreement to pave the street. Quite recently, in Barber v. Rochester, 52 Wn.2d 691

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases