1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 56 Wn.2d
  5. 56 Wn.2d 420 (1960)
 

IN RE HENDRIX v. RHAY

No. 35196.

56 Wn.2d 420 (1960)

353 P.2d 878

In the Matter of the Application of a Writ of Habeas Corpus of PRINCE EDWARD HENDRIX, Petitioner, v. B.J. RHAY, as Superintendent of the State Penitentiary, Respondent.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

June 30, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Prince Edward Hendrix, pro se.

The Attorney General and Stephen C. Way, Assistant, for respondent.

ROSELLINI, J.

The petitioner, seeking a writ of habeas corpus, maintains that his constitutional rights have been violated because he was refused a free statement of facts, necessary to perfect his appeal.

The petitioner's trial before the superior court for King county, sitting without a jury, resulted in his conviction of the crime of burglary in the second degree. He was represented by counsel of his choice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases