STATE, EX REL. LINDEMANN v. PRESTON

Nos. 36576 and 36577.

171 Ohio St. 303 (1960)

THE STATE, EX REL. LINDEMANN, v. PRESTON, DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS, ET AL. THE STATE, EX REL. BENUA, v. PRESTON, DIRECTOR OF HIGHWAYS, ET AL.,

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided November 16, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Gingher & Christensen and Mr. Chalmers P. Wylie, for relators.

Mr. Mark McElroy, attorney general, Mr. Russell Leach, city attorney, Mr. William E. Fowler, Jr., Mr. William D. Henry and Mr. Joseph D. Bryan, for respondents.


PECK, J.

The question presented is an intriguing one and may be stated in this manner: Is an appropriating authority required by law to include in the resolution or finding, instituting a proceeding to appropriate a dominant estate, a specific description of an appurtenant easement and to separately fix the value by which the easement increases the value of the dominant estate?

Before passing to the consideration of this question, however, it should first...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases