BRITZ v. KINSVATER

No. 6621.

87 Ariz. 385 (1960)

351 P.2d 986

Maurice BRITZ and Clare A. Britz, husband and wife, Appellants, v. Mathilda KINSVATER, a single woman, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

May 4, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shute & Elsing, Phoenix, for appellants.

Marvin Johnson, Phoenix, for appellee.


UDALL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff, Mathilda Kinsvater, and against defendants-appellants, Maurice A. and Clare A. Britz. The action was one to recover payments of interest which were allegedly usurious, i.e., in violation of A.R.S. § 44-1202. The case was tried to the court, sitting without a jury. The parties will hereinafter be designated as they appeared in the trial court, i...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases