POCHOLEC v. GIUSTINA ET AL


224 Or. 245 (1960)

355 P.2d 1104

POCHOLEC v. GIUSTINA ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed October 12, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James A. Pearson argued the cause for appellant. On the briefs were McCoy & Pearson, Eugene.

Windsor Calkins argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Calkins & Calkins, Eugene.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and HOWELL, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

O'CONNELL, J.

This is an action to recover damages for the death of Ronnie Pocholec, a nine-year old boy, who drowned in the defendant's log pond. The plaintiff, administrator of the decedent's estate, appeals from a judgment entered upon a verdict for the defendant.

The defendant maintains a log pond at Springfield, Oregon, on land in its possession and under its control. The pond, which covers approximately 20 acres, was constructed by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases