1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Minn.
  4. 258 Minn.
  5. 258 Minn. 210 (1960)
 

CITY OF LITCHFIELD v. TOWNSHIP OF PAYNESVILLE

No. 37,934.

258 Minn. 210 (1960)

103 N.W. (2d) 402

CITY OF LITCHFIELD v. TOWNSHIP OF PAYNESVILLE AND OTHERS.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

June 3, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Burns & Burns and Erickson, Popham & Haik, for appellant.

LeRoy A. Gayner, for respondent city of Litchfield.

Charles A. Swenson, for respondent village of Atwater.

V.W. Lundquist, County Attorney, for respondent county of Kandiyohi.

Nobel Shadduck, for respondent village of Kimball.

NELSON, JUSTICE.

This proceeding was instituted by the city of Litchfield in Meeker County to determine the settlement of Florence Kinlund, a poor person, within the provisions of M.S.A. c. 261. The township of Paynesville in Stearns County, city of Willmar, Kandiyohi County, village of Atwater, and village of Kimball are defendants. Findings were entered determining the township of Paynesville to be the settlement for poor-relief purposes of Florence Kinlund and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases