NAT'L BANK OF NEW YORK v. SCHINASI


24 Misc.2d 444 (1960)

National City Bank of New York, Plaintiff, v. Albert D. Schinasi et al., Individually and as Copartners Doing Business as Natal Garment Co., et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

April 20, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold H. Keefe and Anthony Christy for plaintiff.

S. Martin Adelman for defendants.


MATTHEW M. LEVY, J.

The plaintiff moves for summary judgment (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 113). While there is no limitation on the power of the court to grant such a motion at any stage of the proceedings (Ecker v. Muzysh, 259 App. Div. 206), it is worthy of note that an application by the plaintiff for this relief was, as long ago as June, 1952, denied without prejudice to renewal. Instead of moving promptly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases