1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 9 Wis.2d
  5. 9 Wis.2d 451 (1960)
 

STOHR v. TWIN LAKES

9 Wis.2d 451 (1960)

STOHR and others, Appellants, v. VILLAGE OF TWIN LAKES, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 8, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Lepp & Lepp of Kenosha, and oral argument by Burton Lepp.

For the respondent there was a brief by Moran, O'Brien & Richardson of Delavan, and Quarles, Herriott & Clemons, attorneys, and Maxwell H. Herriott and Laurence C. Hammond, Jr., of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Hammond.

FAIRCHILD, J.

Plaintiffs' Exhibit 2, reproduced herewith, is a map of part of the village of Twin Lakes. The crosshatched areas are the lands of petitioners. At the left of Exhibit 2, and south of the railroad track, is an area which we will refer to as area 1. Area 2 is to the north of area 1, across the railroad track. Area 3 is the crosshatched area with irregular boundaries near the center of the exhibit. Area 4 is at the right. Area 1 contains more than 200 acres...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases