MAW v. NOBLE

No. 9107.

10 Utah 2d 440 (1960)

354 P.2d 121

HERBERT B. MAW, WENDELL B. HAMMOND AND GEORGE K. FADEL, PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS, v. BRACK HOWARD NOBLE AND ANN C. NOBLE, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

Supreme Court of Utah.

July 14, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cotro-Manes & Cotro-Manes, Salt Lake City, for appellants.

Herbert B. Maw, George B. Hammond, George K. Fadel, Bountiful, for respondents.


McDONOUGH, Justice.

This appeal challenges a determination that the interest on the damages awarded in a condemnation suit is a part of "amounts recovered" under an attorneys' contingent fee agreement.

Brack Howard Noble and his wife, Ann, were named defendants in a condemnation suit by the state to take land they owned lying in the path of proposed improvements to U.S. Highway 91 just north of Salt Lake City, near the Salt Lake-Davis County lines. After negotiations...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases