1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 10 Wis.2d
  5. 10 Wis.2d 438 (1960)
 

MINER v. MINER

10 Wis.2d 438 (1960)

MINER, Respondent, v. MINER, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 3, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief and oral argument by Clyde M. Paust of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by Affeldt & Lichtsinn, and oral argument by Karl M. Anderson, all of Milwaukee.

HALLOWS, J.

The defendant contends there are two questions on this appeal: 1. Can a stipulation entered into at the time of the divorce, providing for alimony, be modified by the court when there is a substantial change of circumstances? 2. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in refusing to modify the alimony award because the plaintiff had obtained full-time employment and was self-supporting, and because the defendant had suffered a substantial decline in income...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases