BEYER v. KELLER


11 A.D.2d 426 (1960)

Mary R. Beyer, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Albert Beyer, et al., Respondents, v. Edward Keller et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 29, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James J. Malloy of counsel (Flood & Malloy, attorneys), for appellants.

Eugene L. Sugarman of counsel (Sugarman, Kuttner & Fuss, attorneys), for respondents.

BREITEL, J. P., RABIN, VALENTE and BASTOW, JJ., concur in Per Curiam opinion; McNALLY, J., dissents and votes to reverse in opinion.


Per Curiam.

This case again presents the question of whether post-accident statements taken by investigators should be made available in advance of trial at the request of a party. Special Term here granted the plaintiffs' application and directed that a copy of the statement given by the mother of the injured infant plaintiff be delivered to the plaintiffs' attorneys.

The infant plaintiff, then two years...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases