GILLESPIE v. MURPHY


224 Or. 212 (1960)

355 P.2d 723

GILLESPIE v. MURPHY

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed October 5, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles S. Crookham, Portland, argued the cause for the appellant. With him on the brief were Duane Vergeer and Vergeer & Samuels, Portland.

Arthur S. Vosburg, Portland, argued the cause for the respondent. With him on the brief were Vosburg, Joss, Hedlund & Bosch, Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, WARNER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and HOWELL, Justices.


AFFIRMED.

SLOAN, J.

Plaintiff was awarded a verdict and judgment against defendant for damages for injuries sustained in an automobile collision between automobiles operated by the parties. Defendant appeals. Three of the assignments of error are directed at the failure of the trial court to direct a verdict, or related questions. The other assignment claims error for the failure of the court to give a requested instruction.

The accident in question...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases