1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 11 A.D.2d
  5. 11 A.D.2d 419 (1960)
 

DEMPSEY v. ATL. & PAC. TEA CO.

11 A.D.2d 419 (1960)

Thomas Dempsey, Respondent, v. Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

November 22, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome Doyle of counsel (H. Richard Schumacher with him on the brief; Cahill, Gordon, Reindel & Ohl, attorneys), for Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company, appellant.

Samuel Harris Cohen of counsel (Ira Drogin with him on the brief; Boudin, Cohen & Glickstein, attorneys), for Local Union 400 of the Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen of North America, AFL-CIO, appellant.

Samuel Bader of counsel (Bader & Belson, attorneys), for Local Union No. 489, appellant.

Edward D. Burns of counsel (Joel S. Stern with him on the brief; Roy M. Cohn, attorney), for respondent.

BOTEIN, P. J., BREITEL and McNALLY, JJ., concur.

STEVENS, J.

These are separate appeals from orders denying the motions of defendant-appellant, the Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company (hereinafter called A & P) and defendants-appellants Local Union No. 400 and Local Union No. 489 (hereinafter called Unions) to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the court lacks jurisdiction of the subject matter. Additionally, Unions contend there exists a judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases