DiGIANNANTONIA v. PGH. RWYS. CO.


402 Pa. 27 (1960)

DiGiannantonio, Appellant, v. Pittsburgh Railways Company.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

December 1, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murray S. Love, with him Wirtzman & Sikov, for appellants.

Leo Daniels, with him James A. Geltz, and Prichard, Lawler & Geltz, for appellees.

Before JONES, C.J., BELL, MUSMANNO, JONES, COHEN, BOK and EAGEN, JJ.


OPINION BY MR. JUSTICE COHEN, December 1, 1960:

Plaintiffs sued to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of the defendant's negligence. At the conclusion of plaintiffs' case, the trial judge entered a compulsory nonsuit which the court en banc subsequently refused to remove. From the judgments entered the plaintiffs have appealed and the sole question involved is whether the evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases