1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 190 F.Supp.
  5. 190 F.Supp. 238 (1960)
 

NISSEN TRAMPOLINE CO. v. INTERNATIONAL TRAM-PO-LINE MFRS.

No. 60-C-843.

190 F.Supp. 238 (1960)

NISSEN TRAMPOLINE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. INTERNATIONAL TRAM-PO-LINE MANUFACTURERS, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court E. D. New York.

November 18, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenyon & Kenyon, New York City, Richard A. Huettner, New York City, and Ooms, Welsh & Bradway, Owen Ooms, Donald L. Welsh, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for plaintiff.

Philip Dinitz, Brooklyn, N. Y., for defendant.

BARTELS, District Judge.

In an action for injunction and damages for alleged copyright and trademark violations, as well as for unfair competition, plaintiff moves for an injunction pendente lite (Rule 56, Fed.Rules Civ. Proc., 28 U.S.C.A.). Jurisdiction is based on the copyright and trademark laws of the United States; there is also diversity of citizenship.

At the hearing testimony was adduced which established...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases