1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 59 N.J.
  5. 59 N.J. Super. 363 (1960)
 

RUNNACLES v. DODDRELL

59 N.J. Super. 363 (1960)

157 A.2d 836

HARRY RUNNACLES AND LOUISE RUNNACLES, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. GRACE DODDRELL AND KENNETH S. DODDRELL, HER HUSBAND, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 1, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Joseph E. Connolly argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Messrs. Marley, Winkelried & Hillis, attorneys).

Mr. William Ward Wimmer argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.

Before Judges GAULKIN, SULLIVAN and FOLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FOLEY, J.A.D.

Appeal is taken by defendants from an adverse jury verdict entered in the Law Division.

Both plaintiffs suffered personal injuries when the vehicle owned and operated by Harry Runnacles was in collision with the Doddrell car. The limited scope of the appeal makes it unnecessary for us to recite the facts in detail.

The first point made by appellants...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases