MADISON v. MONONA


10 Wis.2d 32 (1960)

CITY OF MADISON, Respondent, v. VILLAGE OF MONONA, Appellant. ENGELHART, Respondent, v. SAME, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

April 5, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Robert C. Buehner, attorney, and Immell, Herro, Buehner & DeWitt of counsel, all of Madison, and oral argument by Jack R. DeWitt.

For the respondents there was a brief and oral argument by Harold E. Hanson, city attorney, for the city of Madison, and C. Bruce Thomas of Madison, for Herbert M. Engelhart.


DIETERICH, J.

On May 5, 1958, respondent Engelhart sought to annex certain territory in the town of Blooming Grove to the city of Madison, and on May 6, 1958, Thomas O. Mackesey sought to annex part of the same territory to the village of Monona.

The law is well settled that where two proceedings are begun about the same time and in good faith, whereby each attempts to annex the same area, the proceedings first instituted must have precedence. Greenfield...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases