1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 189 F.Supp.
  5. 189 F.Supp. 224 (1960)
 

BRYANT v. UNITED STATES

Cr. 8785.

189 F.Supp. 224 (1960)

George Harding BRYANT, Vance W. Heideman, and Stanley V. Kessel, Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent.

United States District Court D. North Dakota, Southeastern Division.

December 9, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

P. W. Lanier, Jr., Fargo, N. D., for petitioner, George Harding Bryant.

Edward J. Murphy, Fargo, N. D., for petitioners, Vance W. Heideman and Stanley V. Kessel.

Robert L. Vogel, U. S. Atty., Fargo, N. D., for respondent.

RONALD N. DAVIES, District Judge.

The matter now before the Court stems from the application of the three petitioners herein, Bryant, Heideman and Kessel, for vacation of their sentences under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The motions were denied. Bryant, Heideman and Kessel v. United States of America, D.C., 173 F.Supp. 574. Reference to that opinion obviates the necessity for repetitious restatement of background.

Thereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases