WEYGANDT, C. J.
First it should be noted that this highway improvement project involved the appropriation of none of the plaintiff's property although the pavement was widened on the opposite side of the street.
Nor was there a change of grade in front of the plaintiff's property.
Likewise, there is no claim of interference with the plaintiff's use of the westerly half of Summit Street which extends in a general northerly and southerly direction.<...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.