1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Misc.2d
  4. 22 Misc.2d
  5. 22 Misc.2d 389 (1960)
 

MARTIN v. CITY OF NEW YORK

22 Misc.2d 389 (1960)

Edmond Martin, Plaintiff, v. City of New York et al., Defendants.

Supreme Court, Special Term, New York County.

March 31, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edmond Martin, plaintiff in person.

Charles H. Tenney, Corporation Counsel (Saul Moskoff and Joseph B. Goldman of counsel), for City of New York, defendant.

Howard M. Squadron, Shad Polier, Will Maslow, Leo Pfeffer and Joseph B. Robison for American Jewish Congress, amicus curiæ.

ARON STEUER, J.

The action is for a declaratory judgment. The motion and cross motion are for summary judgment. The purpose is to test the constitutionality of Local Law 80. (Local Laws, 1957, No. 80 of City of New York.) Whatever else one may think about the plaintiff or this proceeding, one thing is admirable, the directness and simplicity of the attack. Local Law 80 is designed to prevent discrimination in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases