1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 183 F.Supp.
  5. 183 F.Supp. 220 (1960)
 

UNITED STATES v. PABST BREWING COMPANY

No. 59-C-215.

183 F.Supp. 220 (1960)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. PABST BREWING COMPANY, Schenley Industries, Inc., The Val Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court E. D. Wisconsin.

April 7, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Earl A. Jinkinson, Francis C. Hoyt, Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Div., Chicago, Ill., Edward G. Minor, U. S. Atty., Milwaukee, Wis., for plaintiff.

John T. Chadwell, Snyder, Chadwell, Keck, Kayser & Ruggles, Chicago, Ill., Ray T. McCann, Milwaukee, Wis., for Pabst Brewing Co.

Robert S. Marx and Roy G. Holmes, Nichols, Wood, Marx & Ginter, Cincinnati, Ohio and Ralph M. Hoyt, Milwaukee, Wis., for Schenley Industries and The Val Corp.

TEHAN, Chief Judge.

On October 1, 1959, the plaintiff, United States of America, filed its complaint against the defendants, Pabst Brewing Company, Schenley Industries, Inc., and The Val Corporation, alleging that the acquisition by Pabst on or about July 30, 1958 of all the assets and business of Val, formerly Blatz Brewing Company, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Schenley, was violative of § 7 of the Clayton Act, Title 15 U.S.C.A. § 18. The plaintiff asked...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases