WHARTON v. FID.-BALTO. NAT. BANK

[No. 133, September Term, 1959.]

222 Md. 177 (1960)

158 A.2d 887

WHARTON, JR. v. FIDELITY-BALTIMORE NATIONAL BANK ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided March 28, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Vernon Eney and Robert M. Thomas, with whom were David C. Green, Russell R. Reno, Jr., and Venable, Baetjer & Howard on the brief, for appellant.

Clarence W. Miles, with whom were H. Donald Schwaab and Robert L. Karwacki on the brief, for The Martin Company, one of the appellees.

Submitted on brief by Frank B. Ober and Robert Stinson for Fidelity-Baltimore National Bank, the other appellee.

The cause was argued before HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ., and NILES, Chief Judge of the Supreme Bench of Baltimore City, specially assigned.


NILES, Chief Judge of the Supreme Bench of Baltimore City, by special assignment, delivered the opinion of the Court.

The question presented in this case is whether a director of a corporation is an "employee" of, or "employed" by, or in the "employment" of the corporation. The case arises upon the interpretation of a restricted stock option agreement and related documents, under the terms of which the option is not exercisable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases