1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 166 A.2d
  5. 166 A.2d 191 (1960)
 

RUTLAND CABLE T. V., INC. v. CITY OF RUTLAND

No. 1905.

166 A.2d 191 (1960)

RUTLAND CABLE T. V., INC. v. CITY OF RUTLAND and the City Council of Rutland.

Supreme Court of Vermont. Washington.

November 29, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bloomer & Bloomer, Rutland, for plaintiff.

Richard F. Sullivan, Rutland, for defendants.

Before HULBURD, C. J., and HOLDEN, SHANGRAW, BARNEY and SMITH, JJ.

HOLDEN, Justice.

This is the third time the petitioner has resorted to mandamus in aid of its application of September 10, 1959 to the City Council of Rutland for a permit to construct television cable facilities in that city. The prior proceedings are reported in 121 Vt. 399, 159 A.2d 83 and 122 Vt. 1, 163 A.2d 117.

The present petition alleges in substance that following the mandate of this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases