1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 63 N.J.
  5. 63 N.J. Super. 287 (1960)
 

STATE v. BRILLO MFG. CO.

63 N.J. Super. 287 (1960)

164 A.2d 627

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. BRILLO MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 19, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Morris Gottlieb, of the New York Bar, argued the cause for the defendant-appellant (Messrs. Brenner & New, attorneys).

Mr. Robert S. Miller, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the plaintiff-respondent (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General, attorney).

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, J.A.D.

Brillo Manufacturing Company, Inc. (Brillo) was convicted in the municipal court upon a complaint which charged that Brillo "at premises known as Steve & Jim's Market, * * * did then and there have in their possession and sell one (1) package of Brillo Soap Pads marked (12) twelve in a box and which actually did contain 11 pads contrary to R.S. 51:1-96 (third offense) * * *." Brillo appealed to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases