BRUNO v. HANNA


63 N.J. Super. 282 (1960)

164 A.2d 647

EMERIC BRUNO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. JOHN HANNA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 17, 1960.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frank Romano argued the cause for plaintiffs-respondents.

Mr. Joseph Feinman argued the cause for defendants-appellants.

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by SULLIVAN, J.A.D.

This appeal involves the construction of certain restrictive covenants of record insofar as they affect ten lots of vacant land in Ridgefield, New Jersey, owned by plaintiffs and on which plaintiffs propose to erect duplex dwellings for two or more families. Defendants, who are also property owners in the area in which the covenants are effective, contend that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases