1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 62 N.J.
  5. 62 N.J. Super. 280 (1960)
 

DE NIKE v. BD. OF TRUSTEES, ETC., RETIREMENT SYS.

62 N.J. Super. 280 (1960)

162 A.2d 891

MATTIE DE NIKE, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Reargued May 24, 1960.

Decided June 27, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Franklin W. Kielb argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant.

Mr. Lee A. Holley, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for the defendant-respondent (Mr. David D. Furman, Attorney General, attorney).

Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and FOLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Law Division which denied her motion for summary judgment and dismissed her complaint "on the ground of the lack of jurisdiction."

The complaint alleges that plaintiff's deceased husband, William E. De Nike, "On or about January 20, 1955 pursuant to R.S. 43:15A-47 * * * filed a duly attested application for retirement * * * as Borough Clerk of ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases