1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 223 Or.
  5. 223 Or. 112 (1960)
 

EMERSON v. HOOD RIVER COUNTY ET AL

223 Or. 112 (1960)

353 P.2d 247

354 P.2d 74

EMERSON v. HOOD RIVER COUNTY ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Reversed with directions June 15, 1960.

Opinion modified, petition for rehearing denied July 13, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Denton G. Burdick, Jr., Portland, argued the cause and filed briefs for appellant Walton.

Gunther F. Krause, Portland, argued the cause for appellants Hood River County, Sheldrake, Hukari and Kreig. With him on the briefs were Teunis J. Wyers, Hood River, and Krause, Lindsay & Nahstoll and Alan H. Johansen, Portland.

Dick & Dick, The Dalles, for the petition.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and MILLARD, Justices.

REVERSED WITH DIRECTIONS.

Roger L. Dick, The Dalles, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dick & Dick, The Dalles.

GOODWIN, J.

Hood River County and the other named defendants appeal from a declaratory decree entered in the circuit court for said county which determined that the plaintiff, Emerson, was the owner of certain valuable timber at a date four years earlier when the defendants removed and disposed of it.

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases