1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 220 Or.
  5. 220 Or. 114 (1960)
 

TAYLOR v. GRANT

220 Or. 114 (1960)

349 P.2d 282

TAYLOR ET UX v. GRANT ET AL TAYLOR ET UX v. THORNTON ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed January 27, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wilber Henderson, Portland, argued the cause for the appellants. With him on the brief was Guy Cordon, Washington, D.C.

William E. Hurley, Portland and C.X. Bollenback, Portland, argued the cause for the respondents. With them on the briefs were Bernard, Bernard & Edwards, Jonathan Edwards, Maguire, Shields, Morrison, Bailey & Kester and James G. Smith, all of Portland.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and PERRY, SLOAN and KING, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

SLOAN, J.

Each of these consolidated cases is an action for money had and received. Judgment for defendants in each case is appealed by plaintiffs. The detailed facts which prompted these actions are set forth in previous cases involving the same or equivalent parties and the same transaction. Siniscal v. United States, 208 Fd2 406, (9 Cir, 1953); cert den 348 U.S. 818, 75 S.Ct. 29, 99 L ed 645;

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases