1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 224 Or.
  5. 224 Or. 95 (1960)
 

PARIS ET UX v. SMITH ET AL

224 Or. 95 (1960)

355 P.2d 635

PARIS ET UX v. SMITH ET AL

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed September 28, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gordon G. Carlson, Roseburg, argued the cause for appellants. On the brief were Yates, Murphy & Carlson, Roseburg.

Robert M. Stults, Roseburg, argued the cause for respondents Glenn Smith and Clara Smith and for cross-appellant Glenn Smith. With him on the briefs was Don H. Sanders, Roseburg.

George W. Neuner, Roseburg, argued the cause for respondents Mark Averill and Ralph Averill. With him on the brief were Clark W. Adams, Aberdeen, Washington, and Long, Neuner & Dole, Roseburg.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and WARNER, SLOAN, O'CONNELL and HOWELL, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

SLOAN, J.

This was a suit in partition. The issues to be decided were derived from conflicting claims of ownership to two separate undivided one-sixth interests in the real property to be partitioned. Plaintiff claimed ownership of one of the one-sixth interests which was disputed by the defendants Glenn Smith and Clara A. Smith. The title to the other one-sixth interest involved a conflict between the defendant, and in respect to this claim, cross...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases