1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 64 N.J.
  5. 64 N.J. Super. 250 (1960)
 

BIALOBLOCKI v. SAWICKI

64 N.J. Super. 250 (1960)

165 A.2d 804

SYGMUNT BIALOBLOCKI, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF WANDA BIALOBLOCKI, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. VINCENT SAWICKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND THE MIDDLESEX EXCAVATING CO., DEFENDANT, AND THE LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD CO., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. VINCENT SAWICKI, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE LEHIGH VALLEY RAILROAD CO., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND THE MIDDLESEX CONCRETE PRODUCTS & EXCAVATING CO., DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided November 17, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Andrew V. Clark argued the cause for appellant (Mr. John P. Kozak, on the brief).

Mr. James B. Emory argued the cause for respondent Lehigh Valley Railroad Co. (Messrs. Lamb, Langan & Blake, attorneys; Mr. James B. Emory, on the brief; Mr. James J. Langan, of counsel).

Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and FOLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.

In consolidated actions arising out of an automobile accident, Vincent Sawicki appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict against him in favor of plaintiffs Bialoblocki in the Superior Court, Law Division, and from a judgment of no cause for action in favor of defendant Lehigh Valley Railroad Company (herein Lehigh) in his affirmative suit against it....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases