1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 171 Ohio
  5. 171 Ohio St. 133 (1960)
 

DAILEY v. DAILEY

No. 36244.

171 Ohio St. 133 (1960)

DAILEY, APPELLEE, v. DAILEY, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 15, 1960.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Butler, Addison, Smith & Carmack and Mr. Gale R. King, for appellee.

Messrs. Ginocchio & Ginocchio and Mr. Earl W. Charls, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

It is contended by defendant that the recent decision of this court in Hunt v. Hunt, 169 Ohio St. 276, 159 N.E.2d 430, requires the reversal of the judgment below. With this contention we cannot agree.

Paragraph one of the syllabus in the Hunt case reads as follows:

"Where, in a divorce action, permanent alimony is ordered paid by the husband to the wife in a fixed amount...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases